the female body is hardcore as fuck.
Yes it is.
so is the male body
it’s sad to see so many people like this on this website
OP is praising the fact that women hold a fucking infant in their belly the size of a ribcage, get the fuck over yourself for 3.5 seconds.
*~*~follow for more fragile male ego~*~*
The male body is more susceptible to hereditary diseases because of their lack of a second X chromosome. Their testosterone production ages them faster and causes them to die sooner. Their center of gravity is higher because of their tiny little hips and overgrown shoulders, making them easier to topple. Their gonads are placed outside of the body, in a very vulnerable position, because they do not function properly if they get a little bit warmer than usual. They have non-functional nipples, but still enough breast tissue to get cancer.
The male body is not hardcore. The male body is to the female body what a shoddy, unstable mod is to a well-estabilished piece of software. Sit the fuck down. And try to not crush your fragile pathetic outside gonads when you do it.
The developer of Call Of Duty has said that COD players aren’t real gamers because they rarely try other franchises
I’m laughing so hard oh my god imagine how they must feel knowing he thinks that about them
Fake Gamer Boys
oh this tastes so fucking good
I would just like to tell everyone who I shut down for recommending this game series to me that I was fucking right.
Jane Goodall shares an important message on the need for empathy in science, and how viewing intelligent and social non-humans as “animal beings” can help us not only treat them with the respect they deserve, but also understand how their complex biology and behavior is intertwined with our own.
cecil episode 3: “and it was warm, the pizza slice.”
cecil episode 44: “i am not a good salesman.”
no kidding, cecil. we’ve known you’re a terrible salesman for a while now.
I’m not going to speak on the Bindi specifically, because there’s a lot of Desi folks you could ask about this in depth.
(“You” here is not you specifically, instead aimed at appropriators etc.)
I’ll talk about accessible and pull from a simple example. A few years back I went to a parade in Japantown. It was specifically based in a Japanese folk tradition, with part of it including folks having to carry a platform, playing music, etc.
At the very end of the parade, clearly uninvited, showed up all these white people in fake geisha gear, on stilts, who… looked like horrible caricatures who decided on their own they were going to “join in the parade”.
"Why was the parade accessible to us if they didn’t want us to join in?"
Now, there’s different levels of ownership and participation and meaning to all things. One of the most disingenuous things people do is try to pretend all cultural practices and actions are equally loaded. ”Oh, well, are you saying I can’t eat Indian food, huh, huh?”
The real problem is one of invading space and the power of definition.
When you eat food, you’re not invading anyone’s space. You’re cooking at home, you’re eating at a restaurant - these are expected things. This is very different than showing up at someone’s cultural practice and forcibly pushing your way in. It’s different than deciding you’re going to wear someone else’s history as a toy, as a costume, in public, because it’s fun for you.
It’s also different than taking pictures, or perhaps making books or artbooks of yourself dressed as them, or making their food, or selling DVDs on how to make their music, for your profit because you know you can sell it better because you’re white.
And this stuff always clearly shows because people who participate are working WITHIN the original cultural communities, whereas appropriators never do. They’re not interested in the people, they’re interested in taking something “accessible” and then getting rid of the people, the context, and the origins that it came from.
It says everything that “cultural appreciation” strangely requires removing the people who created it, removing the names and lineages, and the actual history of it and putting yourself in it’s place.
Lots of things are accessible. That doesn’t mean you get to go take them and then claim ownership.
I hope Emma Watson makes a statement thanking and exposing the assholes who are threatening to hack her and release so-called “intimate” photos cause they’re just proving her point even further that feminism is needed.
Are you fucking kidding me? Like, no, Shakespeare wouldn’t tweet a sonnet cause 140 characters is a bit short for that. Wrong medium. But you know what he would have? A very active twitter FULL OF DICK PUNS AND YOUR MOM JOKES okay. (And probably also a blog for the sonnets and longer works, that cross-posts links to twitter anyway.)
Get out of here with that pretentious anti-technology bullshit.
He’d rock the fuck out of memes. Don’t deny it.
Exit, pursued by a doge.
much run wow
I don’t understand people who try to make Shakespeare into a pretentious thing cause he was basically an uneducated dick-joke making dude for the common masses. His historical plays are straight up fanfiction. There’s a scene in Macbeth where two guards are having a conversation as a dude pees on a wall. Get out of here with your Shakespeare snobbery.